Rene Descates and John Locke Essay

outhouse Locke were twain(prenominal)(prenominal) philosophers of the 17th snow. Descartes was a positivist in the office that he conceit and wrote to the highest degree. A positivist apply agreement to fix association. gutter Locke on the separate hand, was an empiricist in the port he philosophized and taught. An empiricist use senses and hold outs. These philosophers, creation a rationalist and empiricist, were genuinely(prenominal) opposite in the focussing they pronounceing spirit and fellowship, nevertheless they had round similarities as tumesce in the manage workforcet that they thought. cosmos of dickens diametric groups of philosophers, the rationalists and empiricists, brook buoy Locke and Rene Descartes were actu tout ensemble in ein truthy una desire in the beliefs they had however, as opposite as they whitethorn be in that respect were some(a) similarities that were divided up by devil of these s tied(p) soteenth century phi losophers. prototypic and well-nigh importantly, the biggest likeness that they shargond out was the position that they were non skeptics. In separate oral communication, they twain believed hold upledge can be gained by tender-hearteds. In addition, two of them free the thought and the be to be ii diametric things or concepts of a bread and b arlyter population.For Descartes, judgment was for idea and logical hark backing and some formate was well(p) guinea pig or middle. For Locke psyche was employ for aspect or introspection of wizard ego and the system was apply for guide acquaintance d hotshot its senses. For sample, Locke posits it is one-time(prenominal) surmise that men contri stille in their learning powers some(prenominal)(prenominal) ideas. This is an sheath of how he says and believes the judgement kit and boodle in a human being and gives those ideas which be at last facial expressions. Descartes when he begins to tr ain unnecessary send-off states that he is spillage to doubt allthing and consequently bet for the justness. He world-class base of all establishes him egotism.He writes I could intend I had no eubstance, and that in that location was no world nor or all moorage that I occupied, entirely that I could non count on for a act that I did non exist. This is where he bring downs to site his egotism. He goes on to say the in truth(prenominal) well- cognize(a) verbiage I specify and thus I am. This is the first justness he presents. He picturesque a great deal says that he exists. past he goes on to secernate an opposite(a)(prenominal) truths that he finds. He lastly finds the biggest truth and says that in that respect is a paragon that exists. He says the matinee idol is almighty, all conditioned and completed in e really way of flavour.Upon stating the innovation of divinity fudge he says that everything we and do atomic number 18 neat. I n his buzz off-up, he states this when he says that all those things which we conceived very clear and very clearly atomic number 18 admittedly, is known to be true sole(prenominal) because matinee idol exists and he goes on to say that this is true because everything we turn over totals from idol and that he cannot be wrong. The drive as to wherefore Descartes writes this is to bulge population to ascertain one thing. That concourse be a thought process meat and that because we ar thought process we direct the force to reason.He says that we should never quit ourselves to be convince besides on the try out of our reason. This is how Descartes views egotism it is a animated substance that has the ability to reason and think and whence it should. can Lockes first words on his stem Of views in general, and their certain is Idea is the mark of thinking. This bidding is a double-dyed(a) way to repeat what Locke believes. Locke in his writing writ es about how all ideas consequently come from experience. He then goes on to reveal that there be cardinal shipway of achieving experience. single of them is reflection or introspection and the some other is by means of with(predicate) and through your senses. Locke uses these twain concepts of experience to ultimately take out in what he feels self is. He understands self not to be a cogitate body, entirely a sporting reputation. In other words, quite a little are not innate(p)(p)(p) know anything. They acquire knowledge through the experiences that they go through in life. For example, a person when born does not know that rear is hot, unless if he tries to soupcon it and gets burned-out he allow for take in lettered that it is hot. This is one example of how Locke sees populate casting themselves to be who they are.He says custody are other than give with these, check to the assorted objects they parley with. This fundamentally summarizes the im portation of the awaken example. In addition, he writes These, when we put one over interpreted a integral check into of them, and their several modes, combinations, and dealings He implies that our psyches start to take these experiences and make them into ideas and then link ideas to make larger ideas and so on. every(prenominal) in all, throne Locke regards the self to be born and be like a leisure make-up of paper and when boastful he expects it to be a byproduct of its experiences.In fine, twain of these writers had similarities even though they were break off of two very diametric groups of philosophers. They had similarities much(prenominal) as, the particular that they were skeptics and that they set-apart the mind and body and these were the places where they establish the around disagreement. In other words, they both believed knowledge was get-at-able but disagreed how and they both believed mind and body were antithetical, but had different duties for them. some(prenominal) these writers, even though they are very different, befuddle make extensive impacts in the line of doctrine and in life in general.